TL;DR
Get business pricing on tools and workshop supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Pro Tool Reviews’ hands-on comparison found the Ryobi P262 and Ridgid R86012 nearly even in lug-nut removal and lag-bolt driving. Ridgid recorded the higher result on an inertia torque tester and won the comparison, while the reviewer said the tools’ overall performance was closely matched.
Pro Tool Reviews compared Ryobi’s P262 and Ridgid’s R86012 impact wrenches in three hands-on tests, finding close results in two tests and a larger Ridgid advantage on an inertia torque tester. The outlet named Ridgid the winner, while describing the overall matchup as close—a result relevant to buyers weighing Ryobi’s prosumer tools against Ridgid’s pro-focused lineup.
Both tools are 18-volt brushless impact wrenches with three speed modes and Assist Mode, according to the report. Each has a listed maximum no-load speed of 2,800 RPM. Ryobi’s P262 is rated at 600 foot-pounds of breakaway torque; Ridgid’s R86012 is rated at 650 foot-pounds. Those are manufacturer specifications presented in the article, not measurements from the outlet’s tests.
For the bolt-break test, reviewers torqued eight 1½-inch lug nuts to 500 foot-pounds and timed their removal. Ryobi took 33.27 seconds and Ridgid took 33.68 seconds. In a separate 30-second lag-bolt test, Ryobi left 0.36 inches of a 10-by-½-inch lag bolt above the test block; Ridgid left 0.31 inches. These results show small margins, with Ryobi faster on the lug nuts and Ridgid driving the bolt slightly farther.
On the inertia torque tester, the P262 reached 236.6 foot-pounds and the R86012 reached 283.4 foot-pounds. Pro Tool Reviews attributed Ridgid’s advantage in that test in part to its higher listed impact rate: 3,800 impacts per minute, compared with Ryobi’s 3,200. The report says the test isolates torque and differs from the methods manufacturers use to rate their tools.
Ryobi Narrows the Performance Gap
The comparison suggests that Ryobi’s P262 can compete closely with a more pro-oriented model in these specific tests. That does not establish that the two tools perform equally across all jobs or conditions; the findings are limited to the outlet’s test setup. Still, the results give buyers a measured comparison beyond listed torque ratings, which do not tell the entire performance story.
Price and platform may also shape the choice. The report lists bare-tool prices of $179 for Ryobi and $189 for Ridgid. Both models are sold as bare tools in the supplied material, so buyers also need to account for a compatible battery. The reviewer said battery-platform preference could be a deciding factor, alongside the modest test differences.
How the Three Tests Worked
Pro Tool Reviews framed the matchup around the brands’ different market positions: Ridgid as a pro-focused value option and Ryobi as a brand associated with DIYers and homeowners. The article says both brands are part of the same TTI family and describes Ryobi’s HP Brushless line as closing the performance gap. Those descriptions provide the outlet’s rationale for comparing these particular models; they are not test findings.
The outlet used three methods to compare different aspects of performance. The lug-nut test measured timed removal after each nut was tightened to a set torque. The lag-bolt test compared how far a bolt could be driven in 30 seconds. The inertia test recorded the highest reading across three five-second intervals, with three-second breaks. Because the tests measure different tasks, their results should be read separately rather than treated as a single universal ranking.
The report lists the Ryobi at 7.19 inches long and 3.69 pounds bare, compared with 6.75 inches and 3.69 pounds for the Ridgid. Its working-weight figures use different batteries—4.0 amp-hour for Ryobi and 8.0 amp-hour for Ridgid—so those figures are not a direct comparison using identical battery configurations.
““these tools seem fairly evenly matched outside of the inertia torque test””
— Pro Tool Reviews
Limits of the Test Results
The supplied report does not give a publication date, and it does not establish how either wrench would compare across a wider range of fasteners, materials, battery configurations, or job-site conditions. The working-weight figures use different battery sizes, and the source does not describe a test with identical batteries on both tools.
The reported torque-tester readings are specific to the outlet’s method. They should not be treated as directly interchangeable with the manufacturers’ breakaway or fastening torque ratings. The article also does not provide long-term durability results or enough information to determine how much the observed differences would affect a particular user’s work.
Choose by Platform and Task
The report does not announce a follow-up test or a change to either product. For a buyer deciding between them, the next step is to compare the tools against the fasteners and working conditions they expect to encounter, then consider price, battery compatibility, size, and anvil configuration. Ridgid is available with a friction ring or pin detent anvil, while Ryobi’s listed P262 configuration uses a friction ring.
On the supplied evidence, Ridgid takes the comparison because it led the isolated torque test and drove the lag bolt slightly farther. Ryobi removed the test lug nuts marginally faster, and the reviewer characterized the overall results as close. The article leaves the final choice to user needs and platform preference.
Key Questions
Which impact wrench won the comparison?
Pro Tool Reviews named the Ridgid R86012 the winner. It recorded the higher inertia torque reading and drove the lag bolt slightly farther, while Ryobi was quicker in the lug-nut test.
How close were the tools in the lug-nut test?
Ryobi removed eight lug nuts in 33.27 seconds; Ridgid took 33.68 seconds. The test used nuts torqued to 500 foot-pounds.
What torque readings did the outlet record?
On its inertia torque tester, Pro Tool Reviews recorded 236.6 foot-pounds for Ryobi and 283.4 foot-pounds for Ridgid. These are results from that test method, distinct from the manufacturers’ listed torque ratings.
How much do the bare tools cost in the report?
The supplied report lists the Ryobi P262 at $179 and the Ridgid R86012 at $189 as bare tools. It does not list kit pricing.
Does the comparison prove Ryobi matches Ridgid in every job?
No. The findings cover three specific tests and do not establish performance across every fastener, battery setup, or work condition. The reviewer described the overall matchup as close.
Source: rss
Fall yard work Picks
leaf blowers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
